NAME
pamfaildelay - request a delay on failure
SYNOPSIS
##iinncclluuddee <
or,> ##iinncclluuddee <
iinntt ppaammffaaiillddeellaayy((ppaammhhaannddlleett *pamh,, uunnssiiggnneedd iinntt usec));;> DESCRIPTION
It is often possible to attack an authentication scheme by exploiting the time it takes the scheme to deny access to an applicant user. In cases of short timeouts, it may prove possible to attempt a brute forcedictionary attack - with an automated process, the attacker tries all
possible passwords to gain access to the system. In other cases, where individual failures can take measurable amounts of time (indicating the nature of the failure), an attacker can obtain useful information aboutthe authentication process. These latter attacks make use of procedur-
al delays that constitute a covert channel of useful information. To minimize the effectiveness of such attacks, it is desirable tointroduce a random delay in a failed authentication process. LLiinnuuxx-PPAAMM
provides such a facility. The delay occurs upon failure of the ppaammaauutthheennttiiccaattee(3) and ppaammcchhaauutthhttookk(3) functions. It occurs after all authentication modules have been called, but before control is returned to the service application. The function, ppaammffaaiillddeellaayy(3), is used to specify a required minimumfor the length of the failure-delay; the usec argument. This function
can be called by the service application and/or the authentication mod-
ules, both may have an interest in delaying a reapplication for service by the user. The length of the delay is computed at the time it isrequired. Its length is pseudo-gausianly distributed about the maximum
requested value; the resultant delay will differ by as much as 25% of
this maximum requested value (both up and down). On return from ppaammaauutthheennttiiccaattee(3) or ppaammcchhaauutthhttookk(3), independent of success or failure, the new requested delay is reset to its default value: zero. EEXXAAMMPPLLEE For example, a llooggiinn application may require a failure delay of roughly 3 seconds. It will contain the following code:ppaammffaaiillddeellaayy((ppaammhh,, 33000000000000 //** mmiiccrroo-sseeccoonnddss **// ));;
ppaammaauutthheennttiiccaattee((ppaammhh,, 00));; if the modules do not request a delay, the failure delay will be between 2.25 and 3.75 seconds. However, the modules, invoked in the authentication process, may also request delays:(module #1) ppaammffaaiillddeellaayy((ppaammhh,, 22000000000000));;
(module #2) ppaammffaaiillddeellaayy((ppaammhh,, 44000000000000));;
in this case, it is the largest requested value that is used to compute the actual failed delay: here between 3 and 5 seconds. RREETTUURRNN VVAALLUUEE Following a successful call to ppaammffaaiillddeellaayy(3), PPAAMMSSUUCCCCEESSSS is returned. All other returns should be considered serious failures. EERRRROORRSS May be translated to text with ppaammssttrreerrrroorr(3). CCOONNFFOORRMMIINNGG TTOO Under consideration by the X/Open group for future inclusion in the PAM RFC. 1996/1/10BUGS
none known.SEE ALSO
ppaammssttaarrtt(3), ppaammggeettiitteemm(3) and ppaammssttrreerrrroorr(3).Also, see the three LLiinnuuxx-PPAAMM Guides, for SSyysstteemm aaddmmiinniissttrraattoorrss, mmoodduullee
ddeevveellooppeerrss, and aapppplliiccaattiioonn ddeevveellooppeerrss.Linux-PAM 0.56 1997 Jan 12 PAMFAILDELAY(3)